News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Canada's micro-farming model 

Canada's micro-farming model

21 Feb, 2012 01:00 AM
DURING the nights she spent fretting about the future of the earthmoving business she runs with her partner, Nicole Huska conceived a plan for a farming model that aims for change literally one acre at a time.

The 29-year-old Canadian mother of three has an ambition to build a network of micro-farms that make productive the thousands of small plots of fertile land currently unused on large housing blocks and hobby farms - in fact any unused land.

The farmers, in Ms Huska's plan, will be the young or currently unemployed with a desire to farm but without the means to buy into a conventional farming operation.

The farms Ms Huska aspires to are tiny and run on organic principles, but will be managed along tight business lines that emphasise efficiency and productivity.

The poster farmer for the project is Eliot Coleman, an organic market gardener from Maine, USA, and author of several books about producing vegetables year-round in a cold climate.

The farms' intended output will be a supply of fresh, chemical-free vegetables and fruit sold as close to each micro-farm as possible. Ideally, Ms Huska hopes, a group of micro-farms will form "food hubs" to ensure a constant supply of produce into their local communities.

The landowner gets a rental income from previously unused land (and presumably some fresh veg on the side).

Aspiring farmers get a chance to farm, an opportunity currently out of reach of almost anyone without existing farm equity.

Communities get a new source of quality fresh food, grown with lighter demands on shrinking resources.

And Ms Huska gets to run Nicole's Farm, the management company she has set up to bring her vision to fruition. She plans to scout for land, find new farmers, and hone and transplant the principles of successful micro-farming.

Nicole's Farm is still in the germination stage, but as winter retreats from western Canada, Ms Huska and partner Adam Hammond are clearing two acres north of Vancouver that will serve as their "proof of concept" farm.

The first produce from the farm is scheduled to be in local grocery stores by June 1 this year.

When they have this micro-farm operational, Ms Huska aims to transplant the successful principles to another of the 10 acres that have already been offered to her. And then, she hopes, another acre, and another. She would like to have 10 working acres operational in 2012, and then add up to 50 acres a year.

"It's about re-purposing land in ways that return value to the landowners and the community, and creating jobs that deliver a living wage to people who really want work," she said.

After the 2008 financial crash, North America is full of people looking for work and a new sense of purpose, including young people disillusioned with their university degrees.

Or as Ms Huska, who completed a degree in political science, said "we're a bunch of lost souls looking for purpose and community".

The project was born of a number of frustrations.

The earthmoving business she and Mr Hammond jointly manage has difficulty competing with larger interests, Ms Huska said, and they want to put their expertise in this area to a different use.

They see a role for their existing business in building farm infrastructure on the Nicole's Farm blocks.

At the same time, Ms Huska sees some deep flaws running through the Canadian food system.

In British Columbia, prime apple growing country, stores are selling Australian apples. "Why, when we can grow great apples here?" Similarly, cabbage comes from California.

With three daughters under five, Ms Huska has joined the growing ranks of young mothers concerned about chemical residues in food. She peels certain store-bought produce, and questions why such precautions should be necessary.

The final straw: "The food we get at the grocery store is junk. Carrots don't taste right, cucumbers are disgusting".

The path hasn't been smooth. A fundraising program to get money together to develop the first farm has only raised a fraction of its stated objective.

But Ms Huska is undaunted. "I've got plans B, C and D," she said.

And if the funds haven't yet rolled in, the support has - from people offering land, small grocery stores interested in the produce, and those interested in furthering the concept to revitalise flagging regional economies.

"Our primary resource base in areas like fishing and logging is losing viability. This is another way of generating some locally-based economic stimulation."

www.nicolesfarm.com

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Would it be too much to ask that such stories get held back until the proponents have actually DONE SOMETHING.

For fox ache, it is mid February and the plan is to have two acres ready for cultivation for the northern summer. So what the hell will they be doing next week?

As a multi-decadal renter of rural houses to urban dropkicks, I can confirm that this is standard fantasy for the bull$#iterati. And the dream will not even last long enough for a full planting, let alone a full weeding.

And if you think an acre is small beer, the reality will be only a fraction of that.

Posted by Ian Mott, 21/02/2012 8:51:20 AM
Ian I agree. It's a typical reaction to propaganda from green and animal activist groups - "to grow food naturally man.."

I've been to farmer's markets in California and "pick your own" farms in England and the one defining feature of each is their proximity to major centres.

If the world wants staple, reliable food, like bread and cereal, people have to realize that much food is grown in isolated areas, combined on a global scale and traded internationally.

Posted by Bluey, 21/02/2012 4:52:46 PM
Another point Ian is accurate on is the fact many new or innovative farm businesses actively seek publicity to promote their ventures.

Most are broke and gone within 24 months, but the general public believe all these business models are huge successes and leading the industry.

Posted by Bluey, 21/02/2012 5:53:57 PM
Agreed Motty. However small unviable farmers still survive. They just find their way onto the NSWFA grains committee.
Posted by jock hoskinson, 21/02/2012 6:54:10 PM
thousands of hobbyfarms where on the outskirts of perth and peel region many between 5 to 20 acres privately owned properties, but are now being resumed by government as public open space or parks and recreation, or carbon offsets.

why rent when you can own .

Posted by macca, 22/02/2012 5:26:13 AM
Good idea, Ian, so let's add the GM crop fantasies to that suggestion, shall we?

Out with the 'drought resistant wheat,' the 'saline resistant oats' and the 'vitamin enhanced bananas' fairy tales and stick to the real stories, eh?

Posted by Hebe, 22/02/2012 9:14:47 AM
Wrong Hebe, GM, drought and saline resistance and vitamin enhancement are serious options, pursued on a commercial scale by professional people, with serious money and runs on the board. And a lot more serious operators with serious budgets for serious projects are waiting for the numbers so they can do some serious number crunching.

Those who can, usually do. But those who haven't done, and lack both the means and the bottle to actually do, just serve up a dream masquerading as a plan.

Posted by Ian Mott, 22/02/2012 9:36:49 AM
Yes, serious money, but after 30 years and $45 billion, the only commercial broadacre genetically manipulated (GM) crops have herbicide (mostly Roundup) tolerance and Bt insect toxins. Single genes were cut and pasted from soil bacteria to create them. There are no GM plants with drought tolerance, salt tolerance, nitrogen fixation in grains, or more nutritious, healthier and longer shelf life foods. These traits depend on multiple gene interactions which cannot be transferred using crude GM techniques. Reality test public spending on GM pipedreams and cancel the duds!
Posted by Bob Phelps, 23/02/2012 1:14:04 PM
GM crops are a "spectacular failure" according to Dr E.Ann Clark an Associate Professor in the Department of Plant Agriculture at Guelph Uni. ". "We were promised a lot thirty years ago," she added. "Yields, reduced biocide use, feeding the world, saving the soil, farmers were going to make money. This hasn't happened." Instead, Clark referred to the introduction of these foods into the global food supply as an "abject" and "spectacular failure". " Listen to the whole sorry mess or read the transcript here http://www.kootenaycoopradio.com/deconstructingdinner/column_dreannclark.htm
Posted by Fran Murrell, 23/02/2012 1:36:28 PM
Are you still head of the WA anti-GM nutters, Fran? If GM is such a spectacular failure then how come you feel the need to persecute farmers who choose that option? Surely the facts would speak for themselves, wouldn't they? And you clowns could all go home.

But no, the best comparison we have in WA shows how the Baxters made good money in a hard year with GM Canola. And their "organic" neighbour with the backside out of his pants hardly had a crop worth harvesting.

Some failure.

Get a brain, Phelps, of course the GM crops have roundup tolerance. That was the plan.

Posted by Ian Mott, 24/02/2012 8:17:35 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Nicole Huska aims for change literally one acre at a time.
Nicole Huska aims for change literally one acre at a time.

Most popular articles

Advertisement

Irwin Hunter 160x160


Farm Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.